National Media Descends On Cuccinelli, Bob Schieffer WowedDec. 17, 2010
What were liberals saying about Virginia's lawsuit against the federal government's health care law — that it was a waste of time, that it had no chance, that it was . . . frivolous? Client Number 9 spoke for them all and said "no judge or legal scholar" thought Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli had a snowball's chance in August. The AG told him and all of critics they were wrong. Since March he has taken undignified shots from radical leftists — many granted cover as mainstream by, of course, the mainstream media and Washington elitists — and on Monday he was vindicated. As expected, there's been a media crush on the Attorney General Cuccinelli, with the suddenly awaken press wanting to know what this case was all about after all. One telling interview is below, with long-time Washington media stalwart Bob Schieffer of CBS News, who admitted that Mr. Cuccinelli gave him the best explanation of the issue than anyone has ever given him. Amazing! Maybe that conservative whack job really does know the constitution! Bob, you need to get out more. The issue isn't that complex and smart people don't exclusively live in D.C.
Below, are two more interviews, one each with Attorney General Cuccinelli and Governor Bob McDonnell on Fox News Channel with Greta Van Susteran. In addition to the video, here is a great interview the attorney general gave to National Review Online.
Cantor's Take On Obamacare Ruling: Go Straight To Supreme Court, Vote On RepealDec. 13, 2010
U.S. District Court Judge Henry Hudson today ruled in the Eastern District of Virginia that President Obama's signature health care law, Obamacare, was an unconstitutional mandate forcing people to purchase health insurance that they might not want, need or be able to afford.
Following the decision, Congressman Cantor called for the case to move directly to the U.S. Supreme Court so the issue could be resolved immediately.
Congressman Cantor further stated that when Republicans assume control of the House in January they would pass a clean repeal of Obamacare.
Today's ruling is a clear affirmation that President Obama’s health care law is unconstitutional. The efforts of Governor McDonnell and Attorney General Cuccinelli have raised legitimate concerns and ensured the people of the Commonwealth will have their rights protected against this unconstitutional law. Ultimately, we must ensure that no American will be forced by the federal government to purchase health insurance they may not need, want, or be able to afford.
AG Cuccinelli Drops In Behind Enemy Lines Tonight!Nov. 17, 2010
Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, who has been very visible on national media outlets in his 10 months in office, will participate in an interview tonight in an interesting venue — the new Parker Spitzer show on CNN (8:00 with re-airs throughout the night). You may remember Mr. Spitzer (aka Client No.9), the governor of New York for a few months until it was revealed he had a proclivity for prostitutes. The interview most likely will center on Virginia's lawsuits against the EPA and health care law/Obamacare (Christian Daily News). Before his short reign as governor, Mr. Spitzer served several years as New York's self-styled crusading attorney general, suing any and every company he could find under any pretense so as to make them conform to his control and mandates. Do business in New York? You'll do it the Spitzer way. We saw what the Spitzer way is, of course. Worse than that, he also was, perhaps, the most pro-unlimited-abortion, pro-Planned Parenthood attorney general in the country.
I've seen the show once. Mr. Sptizer, who CNN has shamelessly tried to rehabilitate — the road to television stardom for liberals seems to be get in trouble with the law — teams with the mushy Kathleen Parker to "hold people accountable" (but apparently not the viewers, as its ratings already are tanking, per the Wall Street Journal). Who held self-righteous Mr. Spitzer accountable when he was ruining American businesses? In the show I saw, Mr. Spitzer, documents in hand, emphatically whipping off his glasses for dramatic, courtroom-style effect, grilled Senator-elect Rand Paul (R-Ky.) as if he was a prosecutor and Dr. Paul was a defendant. Dr. Paul was patient, but firm, when refuting Mr. Spitzer's ludicrously lame attempts to portray him as a hypocritical bumpkin, getting in a well-timed deflating shot as well.
Which brings us to tonight. If the interview is anything like the Rand Paul interview, and Mr. Spitzer attempts to don the super-liberal-hero-sophisticate cape again, trying to relive his attorney general glory vs. a true hero, we suspect the arrogant Mr. Spitzer will learn something Virginia liberals learned long ago — try to trip up Mr. Cuccinelli and you'll end up falling over the cliff yourself.
Senator-elect Rand Paul would have nothing of Eliot Spitzer's bloviating.
Virginia Obamacare Law Suit To Be Heard Monday MorningOct. 15, 2010
Virginia's law suit against the new health care law — known officially as "Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II vs. Kathleen Sebelius, Civil No. 3:10CV188, Motion Hearing" — will proceed Monday morning at 9:00 in Judge Henry Hudson's Richmond courtroom. The hearing is on the heels of yesterday's decision by Federal District Judge Roger Vinson in Florida to allow the 20 State Law Suit to proceed as well (21StateLawsuit.com). While that case is behind the Eastern District of Virginia's famous "Rocket Docket," and is where the Virginia case stood about a month ago, the fact that the weight of 21 states now are at full trial over the constitutionality of Obamacare was welcome news to Attoreny General Cuccinelli (Washington Post Virginia Politics Blog). We will be there in the courtroom Monday (or, most likely, in a satellite room with a video feed), and provide our impressions later in the day (electronic equipment is not permitted in the courtroom). So please check in with us. We also hope to be at any post hearing news conference the attorney general may hold, just as we were after the hearing on the federal government's motion to dismiss in July. We were the only media anywhere to post video of the entire news conference (see it here, as relevant points to Monday's hearing were discussed).
We expect Attorney General Cuccinelli will be on several television interview shows throughout Monday afternoon and evening, so there will be plenty of opportunity to hear straight from the source. In the meantime, here's a video of a speech he made at a freedom rally in D.C. last month:
Getting his day in court. More precisely, the people getting their day in court against the government's unprecedented power grab over individual liberty.
Senator Hagan Gets Schooled On Health Care By More Knowledgable ConstituentsSep. 08, 2010
Nothing better illustrates the arrogance of the extremists in Congress who rammed into law government-run health care than these videos (thanks to my cousin B.J.). U.S. Senator Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) tries to tell constituents how great the new system will be until a much more informed mother of two disabled children, who has real life experience and who has read the bill, confronts her. Here's the take at Freedom's Lighthouse. The senator's office had ignored the woman's communications and now woe be unto the senator. The power of the constituent's intensity and focus is remarkable, not to mention her knowledge. She illustrates how she has been able to get coverage for her children up to now, but with the new law, it won't be there — her husband's company is cutting back on coverage because of the new law's taxes and the government agencies created to do so won't pick up the slack.
The senator is alternately in denial and unaware of the facts. But most of all, the woman defines America and its independent spirit and bluntly tells the senator (to applause) that she and her colleagues are redefining and diluting that spirit contrary to all common sense. Words can't describe it. Watch for yourself:
A working mom of three read the bill and understands it. Is that too much to ask of Senator Hagan and the liberals who voted for it?
If that isn't enough, some college students — Students For Life — pin the senator on taxpayer funding of abortion in the law. Of course, the senator denies it. But it's there.
First a mom, then college students for life, school a sitting U.S. senator on what's in the bill, and that includes abortion funding.
These North Carolinians stood up to Senator Hagan and, quite frankly, embarrassed her (as inevitable as that is when defending the indefensible). Now, will Virginians be as bold to Senators Jim Webb and Mark Warner?
While Obama Cuts The Military In Virginia, Raises Taxes On Everyone, Why Not A Fat BRAC?Aug. 16, 2010
Nothing unites Republicans and Democrats faster than a pair of magnets than military base closures in their states. Last week was no different when Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced he would close (see Army Times) the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk as part of a pare down in defense spending. On cue, a bipartisan group of Virginia's Congressional delegation, including both senators, rushed to JFCOM's defense (see Washington Post Virginia Politics Blog). At risk is as many as 6,000 jobs in Virginia. (The conspiracy theory is that Virginia is being targeted by the Obama administration for its aggressive legal challenges to the health care law and the unilateral cap and trade policy implemented by the EPA.) Secretary Gates has the unenviable task of convincing Congress (other states will face cuts as well) — during a recession his boss has exacerbated, if not created — that the Defense Department's mission is to protect the country and not create jobs. He may well be right, but while JFCOM may or may not be needed, while he's cutting fat out of the military, why isn't his boss cutting fat everywhere else?
Several years ago, Congress created the Base Realignment and Closure Commission to target base closings to save money and submit those recommendations to Congress for an up or down vote, because the normal appropriation process presented a more formidable barrier than the Great Wall of China. Congressmen would trade votes to protect bases in each others' districts, regardless of the merits. Political cowardice aside, it still amazes me that Washington insiders are willing to cut the military to save a few billion dollars out of a nearly $3.5 trillion budget, of which $1.5 trillion is borrowed money, while not cutting anything nearly as important.
If Congress can pass the buck to a commission to cut the fat out of the Pentagon, then why not create a commission to cut the fat out of non-defense spending? Call it the Fat BRAC. There are numerous reports by think tanks and watch dog groups, as well as individual congressmen, of deplorable spending (see McCain-Coburn Report). A commission easily could mold these findings into a package of cuts for an up or down vote.
While the Obama administration wants to raise taxes on almost everyone in the middle class and up by letting the 2001 and 2003 tax rate reductions expire, to generate $700 billion over several years (assuming the tax increase doesn't jack up the unemployment rate above 10 percent), it increased spending more than one trillion dollars in one year — $787 billion in one fell swoop with the so-called stimulus bill (more when you factor in interest on the additional debt it created.) That's arrogance and irresponsibility of the highest order. The waste in that bill (and other bills) is of deplorable and unprecedented proportions.
There is something you can do, however. As we mentioned in this post, House Republicans started YouCut, a chance to tell Congress what programs you want to see it eliminate. Each week House Republicans post a list of programs citizens want cut. The GOP Conference brings to the floor the one with the most votes. Hundreds of thousands of people vote each week. We have a permanent link to YouCut on the lower right side of this site. We encourage you to take an active role in this and make your voice heard. Then think about writing your representative and Virginia's two senators, and tell them you want a BRAC for Big Fat Federal Spending.
Congressman Stark: The Federal Government Can Do Anything It Wants, New Rasmussen Poll Shows Americans Vehemently DisagreeAug. 06, 2010
U.S. Representative Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-Calif.) has been in Congress close to 40 years and is one of the most hardcore leftists in the House (see Michael Tennant at The New American). He also is known for outrageous and derogatory comments that, were he a conservative, rightly would hound him out of office (see Elisabeth Meinecke at Human Events). Last year, at a town hall meeting, he told a constituent that, "I wouldn't dignify you by peeing on your leg." (See YouTube.) In June, he mocked those who want the federal government to do something it is supposed to do — secure the border — by asking, "Who are you going to kill today?" (See YouTube.) Those examples only scratch the surface. He's been known to yell at and threaten colleagues, as well. Suffice it to say, he's an arrogant bully, who does not care about anyone but himself, his radical left-wing idealogue colleagues and far left special interest power brokers.
Then, occasionally, he speaks the truth. At least the truth as he wants it. Which is instructive in that it reveals what the Leftist Ruling Class in Washington has in store, should they continue to go unchecked. You can hear for yourself what this senior member of the House thinks about unlimited federal power, an attitude likely to mean the far-left leadership of the House is likely to continue overreaching. It also demonstrates that there's only one way to curb this power — November is coming — as a new Rasmussen poll showed only 9 percent of Americans share Mr. Stark's view of American governance (see Ed Morrissey at HotAir.com).
In the video below, from a town hall meeting two weeks ago, Congressman Stark dismissed a constituent's concern over the health care law's expansive reach into personal lives by telling her Congress is not limited by the U.S Constitution:
Congressman Stark: We have unlimited power to do whatever we want, except that which we are supposed to do.
But Mr. Stark isn't alone. According to the poll (see Rasmussen Reports), 54 percent of the political class align themselves with him (see Mark Tapscott of the Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential blog, here). Steve Watson of PrisonPlanet.com adds that the disconnect extends to the Health Care law, too, with 83 percent of the political class supporting it and 72 percent of voters opposing it.
A Few Concluding Words From The Health Care RulingAug. 02, 2010
Upon further review, here is a telling paragraph toward the conclussion of Federal District Judge Henry Hudson's ruling today that allows Virginia's law suit against against the federal government's ObamaCare health care law to proceed: (see entire ruling here):
While this case raises a host of complex constitutional issues, all seem to distill to the single question of whether or not Congress has the power to regulate — and tax — a citizen's decision not to participate in interstate commerce. Neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor any circuit of appeals has squarely addressed this issue. No reported case from any federal appellate court has extended the Commerce Clause or Tax Clause to include the regulation of a person's decision not to purchase a product, notwithstanding its effect on interstate commerce. Given the presence of some authority arguably supporting the theory underlying each side's position, this court cannot conclude at this stage that the complaint fails to state a cause of action. (Emphasis added.)
The secretary's motion to dismiss will therefore be denied. Resolution of the controlling issues in this case must await a hearing on the merits.
Statement From Attorney General Cuccinelli On Today's Health Care Lawsuit HearingJul. 01, 2010
Below is the news release issued by the Office of the Attorney General regarding today's hearing on the federal government's motion to dismiss Virginia's lawsuit against the health care law. Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli emphasized and elaborated on the quotes below at his post-hearing news conference, which you can see here.
Virginia defends health care lawsuit for first time in court this morning; Federal judge heard feds’ Motion to Dismiss
- Feds say individual insurance mandate is a tax -
Richmond (July 1, 2010) - Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli and his legal team made their first defense of Virginia’s lawsuit against the federal government’s new health care act this morning. Federal district court judge Henry E. Hudson listened to Virginia’s and the federal government’s arguments on U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’s motion to dismiss the suit.
The federal government argued that Virginia lacks the standing to bring a suit, that the suit is premature, and that the federal government has the power under the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause to mandate that citizens must be covered by health insurance or pay a civil penalty. The government also made alternative arguments based upon its taxing power and the Necessary and Proper Clause.
“If the government prevails and Congress may use the Commerce Clause to order Americans to buy private health insurance, then Congress will have been granted a virtually unlimited power to order you to buy anything. That would amount to the end of federalism and our more than 220 years of constitutional government,” Cuccinelli said following the hearing.
Part of the commonwealth’s argument in court was that “the government can’t draft an unwilling citizen into commerce just so it can regulate him under the Commerce Clause.” E. Duncan Getchell, Jr., Solicitor General of Virginia, argued on behalf of the Commonwealth.
When questioned by the judge whether the individual insurance mandate was a tax or a penalty, the attorney for the federal government said it was both, even though members of Congress specifically said they did not pass it as a tax, and President Obama has stated it was not a tax, to appear to keep the president’s promise not to raise taxes on the middle class.
“One mile from the U.S. courthouse where we just argued this case is St. John’s Church, where Patrick Henry gave his famous ‘Give me liberty or give me death’ speech. So it’s fitting that in that courtroom today, just one mile down the road, we were fighting the greatest erosion of our liberty since our country’s founding,” said the attorney general.
Joe Biden Had It Right About Barack Obama, MostlyJun. 03, 2010
Then-Senator Joe Biden, running for vice president, had it right in October 2008, mostly. He said, in a near political death wish, that the "about to be elected" Barack Obama would face a major international crisis, because he was young and someone, somewhere, would "test" him. Remember this?
Another mistake: He said he was "brilliant."
But instead of a foreign country doing us harm, Mr. Biden must have meant a foreign company. That's right. He just "misspoke." Still, the president is being tested — and he isn't passing the test (see Dick Morris). Thank goodness it isn't a foreign country testing him although one wonders about the snickers of those who wish us harm. Certainly they are taking note and we should stay alert.
Of course, the president, as a candidate, brought all this on himself, claiming that government can do everything, from "fixing health care" to stemming the "rise of the oceans" (see Althouse Blog). As a liberal, I'm sure he believes in karma, and the irony of him not being able to fix the Gulf oil spill even as he railed that government could make New Orleans whole immediately after Katrina should not be lost on anyone. Is this the gang you want running your health care? (See The Daily Caller regarding HHS already missing the new law's deadlines.)
So, as it is, it's a foreign company, BP, doing us harm, putting the young administration in (a real) crisis. Thank goodness it's only a company. Let this be a lesson to the government-knows-best crowd.
It's only a foreign company, but President Obama's inability to deal with the crisis leaves a lot to be desired, more doubt about government takeover of industries, and adversaries licking their chops.
Cuccinelli To Update Health Care Lawsuit On June 16 WebcastMay. 27, 2010
Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli on June 16 will Webcast an update on the lawsuit he filed against the federal government's health care law. It requires, for the first time in American history, that Americans purchase something in conflict with Virginia's Health Care Freedom Act. Three days ago, the feds filed a routine motion to dismiss the suit. The commonwealth will respond to this motion by June 7. The federal government then has until June 22 to reply to Virginia's response. At that point, be prepared, as the case will likely accelerate. Toward that end, the attorney general promises to keep Virginians in the loop about the ongoing legal process. Thus, the Webcast . . .
. . . to discuss where we are on the case, what you can expect going forward and the constitutional issues involved. ... I wanted to make sure you have a chance to participate in the health care discussion.
This Webcast is free and open to the public (and not produced at taxpayer expense), but viewers must register (click here). Following the update, there will be a question and answer period. In the meantime, click here to read a column Mr. Cuccinelli wrote about the lawsuit and other commentaries on constitutional issues his office is confronting.
Cuccinelli Thrills Pro-Family NOVA CrowdMay. 19, 2010
Nearly 100 grassroots activists, elected officials and candidates for office attended the Prince William and Manassas Family Alliance Gala dinner Monday evening where they were addressed by Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli. The AG updated the guests on the lawsuit filed by his office defending Virginians from the federal government's new individual mandate to buy health care insurance and its violation of Virginia's new Health Care Freedom Act, passed with bipartisan support this past General Assembly session, as well as the U.S. Constitution's 1oth Amendment and interstate commerce clause. (Click here for the Manassas News & Messenger's coverage.) Interestingly, Mr. Cuccinelli referenced George Washington University Law School professor, and oft quoted, Jonathan Turley who has argued that the federal health care act could be the final blow to the Founder’s vision of federalism. Should Cuccinelli's suit, or the others being brought by nearly two dozen states, fail, Turley insinuates that there would then be very little left outside the control or influence of the federal government. Mr. Cuccinelli added that if the government can compel its citizens to purchase one product (health insurance) there is nothing to stop it from purchasing another product (say, a car made by GM).
Essentially, he is arguing that individual citizens who do not have health insurance are thus not participating in the "interstate commerce" of health care insurance, and so cannot be compelled to purchase it by the federal government under the interstate commerce clause. Case law surrounding the interstate commerce clause is lengthy and confusing to say the least. However, there appears to be no other example where the courts have ruled economic inactivity to be interstate commerce (one exception being from 1792 when Congress compelled people to buy guns — really).
Ultimately, this case is likely to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The AG doesn't think that will take place until at least mid-2012. The individual mandate in the health care bill doesn’t take effect until 2014.
Currently, 21 states, including Virginia, are involved with some type of lawsuit against the federal government concerning the health care law. The two primary suits are in Virginia and Florida. Mr. Cuccinelli urged the crowd Monday night to take advantage of the times to educate and inform their friends and family, particularly their children, on the first principles of our nation’s founding documents, such as the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. Many people today do not know enough about our Founding or what those documents say to understand the implications of the federal government's take over of what has always been a private enterprise.
Few disagree that there is need for some type of health reform in our nation. At The Family Foundation we struggle each year to pay the ever-increasing cost of health care for our staff. But few outside the beltway, or among the academic left, believe that the federal government is capable of managing our nation’s health care system wisely.
Virginia News Stand: May 10, 2010May. 10, 2010
Annotations & Elucidations And They Say Nothing Happens On Monday
Virginia news is pretty slack today, but we are mentioned yet again in the media, this time by Washington Jewish Week, about the state police chaplain prayer policy. People can't seem to stop writing about us. It's because we are making an impact and — to the shock of a startled elite — social conservatism is not out of favor with Americans.
Except for those here watching over the impending European implosion, the major news nationally deals with a Supreme Court nominee and one who will vote to confirm her. President Barack Obama selected Solicitor General Elena Kagan to fill the spot of retiring Justice John Paul Stevens. Meanwhile, one who will vote to confirm her, U.S. Senator Bob Bennett (R-Utah), didn't even qualify for his party's primary ballot, the first Tea Party scalp this year. Infiltrating a Republican nomination process may sound predictable, and cheered by liberals who think GOP divisions may stave their pending November doom, but you may be surprised at the next incumbent Tea Party scalp in the queue: Democrat Representative Allan Mollohan (D-W.Va.), a senior appropriator, who has a primary challenge from a state senator gaining traction because of Rep. Mollohan's pork barrelling ear marks and questionable ethics.
Finally, the health care law has come up short. Already. Again! According to the AP, that guaranteed "kid" coverage (up to age 26!) has run into a snag. Government efficiency and liberal utopia at its best.
*Virginia prayer reversal blasted (Washington Jewish Week)
Police chaplains wary of Va. program (Washington Post)
Effort to shrink Virginia government isn't new (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
McDonnell reform commission chairman pick sparks protest (Norfolk Virginian-Pilot)
1st District GOP candidate: Lawmakers guilty of treason (Woodbridge/Manassas News & Messenger)
McDonnell backs O'Brien in Northern Virginia Senate primary (Washington Post Virginia Politics Blog)
Saxman now a lobbyist (Staunton News Leader)
Obama Nominates Kagan to Seat on Supreme Court (Wall Street Journal)
Federal Reserve opens credit line to Europe (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Premiums may undermine coverage guarantee for kids (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Anti-incumbent mood challenge to veteran Democrat (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Conservatives focus on KY following Bennett defeat in Utah (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan (Ed Whelan/National Review's The Corner Blog)
The Great Disentangling Has Begun: What Bob Bennett’s Defeat Means and Does Not (Erick Erickson/RedState.com)
Will America Follow Greece? (Star Parker/GOPUSA.com)
Arizona Law Also Happens To Be Good Politics (Debra Saunders/GOPUSA.com)
Virginia News Stand: April 27, 2010Apr. 26, 2010
Annotations & Elucidations Northrop Grumman Day In The Commonwealth
At VITA, of course, every day is Northrop Grumman Day, but there is legitimate news to celebrate: A major domestic corporation, a Fortune 500 company, that does business all over the world is moving its HQ to our commonwealth. Of course, to get it to move here, we're giving away 14 million taxpayer dollars and a labyrinth of incentives, tax credits, etc., Wouldn't it be simpler to do away with — or at least greatly reduce — the state corporate income tax? A discussion for another day.
Elsewhere, we make the news in the Old Dominion Watchdog, Governor McDonnell is asked to lift the ban on State Police Chaplains praying in Jesus' name, and how much real estate does the commonwealth own? Norman Leahy, of Tertium Quids, asks. Speaking of such, is the governor going to sell the gubernatorial retreat? Say it ain't so! As usual, our Commentary section is loaded, with Bobby Eberle returning from hiatus and Thomas Sowell as brilliant as ever.
Lots of National News to contemplate, including two GOP insiders in serious trouble in Senate primaries, more about the health care law not doing all it said it would (except for the tax increases, of course), President Obama uses divisive identity politics for partisan political gain, and a commission meets at taxpayer expense to figure out how to reduce the national debt. I'll do it for free: CUT SPENDING!
*Lawmakers restrict public funding for abortions (Old Dominion Watchdog)
Northrop Grumman picks Virginia for headquarters (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
McDonnell, Northrop confirm company has chosen Virginia for headquarters (Washington Post Virginia Politics Blog)
Va. offered Northrop Grumman up to $14 million (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Virginia gives Northrop Grumman up to $14 million to move headquarters (Washington Post Virginia Politics Blog)
McDonnell considers sale of gubernatorial retreat (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
On role of federal lawsuits to AG's term, Cuccinelli and Democrats agree (Washington Post Virginia Politics Blog)
McDonnell asked to lift a ban on State Police troopers referring to Jesus in public prayers (Washington Post Virginia Politics Blog)
Off-track betting center proposed at Innsbrook (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Sullivan seeks GOP nomination for Chesterfield House seat (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Virginia's messy real estate portfolio (Norman Leahy/Tertium Quids)
Arizona pushes immigration politics to forefront (AP/GOPUSA.com)
McCain: Arizona had to crack down on immigration (AP/GOPUSA.com)
GOP prevents cloture on Democrat financial regulation bill (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Obama panel weighs politically toxic deficit fixes (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Some families will face wait to cover young adults (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Free speech versus kids and violent video games (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Obama asks specific Americans for help in 2010 (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Coats favored (barely) in crowded Indiana GOP primary (AP/GOPUSA.com)
With Obama, It's Always 'His' People vs. 'Those' People (Bobby Eberle/GOPUSA.com)
Filtering History (Thomas Sowell/GOPUSA.com)
Are Americans Going John Galt? (Doug Patton/GOPUSA.com)
Obamacare Revealing Changes to Come (David Limbaugh/GOPUSA.com)
Obama Sends in the Clowns (J. Matt Barber/GOPUSA.com)
Cut Gas Prices Now (Richard Olivastro/GOPUSA.com)
National Debt — The Real Dirty Little Secret (Thomas D. Segel/GOPUSA.com)
Virginia News Stand: April 26, 2010Apr. 26, 2010
Annotations & Elucidations 100 Day Review
Much of the state news today is about the "first 100 days" and how the new Gov did during them. He even grades himself in a Richmond Times-Dispatch op-ed yesterday. Also in News, if you didn't see it in a previous post, is an interview with Family Foundation President Victoria Cobb on Richmond's WTVR-TV/CBS6 about the General Assembly's approval of the landmark budget amendment restricting taxpayer funded elective abortions.
In National News, President Obama pays a visit to Pastor Billy Graham even as his Pentagon revokes an invitation to his son Franklin Graham to speak at a National Day of Prayer event there. Meanwhile, Sarah Palin raises money behind enemy lines, but the wind may have already dissipated from the GOP's sails in Massachusetts. In Analysis and Commentary, Michael Barone examines the VAT, Paul A. Ibbetson looks at Barack Obama as King George III, and Debra Saunders details the extreme left-wing views of judicial nominee Goodwin Liu who, during his confirmation hearing, attempted to pull an Obama — What me? An extremist? Oh, my past, that little thing. He's young and a minority and the parallels are remarkable.
*Abortion amendment passes (Video 2:36) (CBS6/WTVR.com)
Mixed reviews for McDonnell’s first 100 days (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
McDonnell's first 100 days: Trip-ups, but more triumphs (Norfolk Virginian-Pilot)
McDonnell reflects on early days in office (Roanoke Times)
Secretary chases goals of governor (Roanoke Times)
Summing up the state budget: what amendments mean (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
McDonnell urges respect for civil liberties in enforcement of immigration laws (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Family Research Council and Republican Liberty Caucus endorse in the 5th (BearingDrift.com)
Climate bill placed on hold over Senate dispute (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Shelby: No deal on financial overhaul before vote (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Health care law's unfinished business: cost curbs (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Obama visits Pastor Billy Graham (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Palin raises money for GOP in liberal Oregon town (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Despite Kennedy loss, Coakley has no GOP opponent (AP/GOPUSA.com)
Hold the VAT (Michael Barone/GOPUSA.com)
Significant Accomplishments in 100 Days (Bob McDonnell/Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Defining the Political Divide (Star Parker/GOPUSA.com)
Barack Obama: Another Grasp at the Crown? (Paul A. Ibbetson/GOPUSA.com)
My Last Goodwin Liu Column — I Really Hope (Debra Saunders/GOPUSA.com)
Philip Dru Obama (Henry Lamb/GOPUSA.com)
Virginia News Stand: April 22, 2010Apr. 22, 2010
Annotations & Elucidations The Landmark Edition
A short edition today, which gives you no excuse for not reading every article. Leading the news is the landmark pro-life budget amendment passed last night by both chambers of the General Assembly. We're quoted and mentioned prominently in the lead link below. This may only be the start. Nationally, states are moving toward using a provision in the government health care takeover law that allows them to opt out of paying for abortion in health care. Ashley Horne of CitizenLink.org has an in-depth analysis of the hows and whys of federal government funding of abortion in this new law, despite the so-called prohibitive language in the legislation and President Obama's executive order supposedly prohibiting it. Speaking of executive orders, Peter Sprigg of FRCBlog explains the impact of the president's order allowing "same-sex partners" hospital visitation rights and such.
While most of the ink is about yesterday's "Veto Session," the Richmond Times-Dispatch highlights yesterday's "Virginia Annual Political Rite of Spring," The Shad Planking in Wakefield. Former governor and senator George Allen was the keynote speaker and about 1,200 attended, less the 138 (two House seats are vacant) from the General Assembly. You'd think they could schedule it on a day when Virginia's princes and princesses could attend. On the other hand . . . maybe that's the point?
*Va. legislature votes to restrict abortion funding (Washington Post Virginia Politics Blog)
McDonnell bid to restrict abortion funding upheld (Norfolk Virginian-Pilot)
Virginia legislature restricts abortion funding (Washington Post)
McDonnell cuts for broadcasting, at-risk children rebuffed (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
House rejects at-risk youth cuts, others by gov (The Daily Press)
Session finalizes budget matters (Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star)
General Assembly veto session a mixed bag (Roanoke Times)
Former McDonnell brother-in-law addresses gay-rights rally (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Allen and about 1,200 turn out for Shad Planking (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
Rep. Scott questions police procedures after hotel visit (Richmond Times-Dispatch)
States Opt Out of Paying for Abortion in Health Care (CitizenLink.org)
Hospital Visit Horrors? Here’s the Rest of the Story (Peter Sprigg/FRCBlog.com)
How Exactly Will the Government Fund Abortion Under the New Health Care Law? (Ashley Horne/CitizenLink.org)