On Tuesday, I had the honor of joining several pro-family leaders, including the Colson Center’s John Stonestreet, Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins, the Southern Baptist Convention’s Russell Moore, and many others, by addressing the crowd on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court as it heard arguments in the Jack Phillips free speech case.

You can watch my remarks here (beginning at the 3-minute mark) on our Facebook page.

unnamed (3).jpg

If you aren’t familiar with the details of the case, I encourage you to watch this video.  This case of significant impact is fundamentally about the role of government vs. freedom.  Do you believe that we should empower our government to force people, particularly those whose occupations require creative speech, to speak in a way that violates their deeply held beliefs?  This is not an issue of a business owner having to “accommodate” anyone who walks in their door – Jack Phillips did that for any individual who entered his cake-making business – including homosexual people.  However, he politely declined a message – in support of so-called same-sex marriage – that violates his conscience, as he had done previously by declining to make cakes celebrating Halloween and in various other instances. 

Those, such as the ACLU, who believe that the government should be able to compel objectionable speech, continue to obfuscate the facts by deceptively ignoring the distinction between a business serving an individual and being forced to participate in an event or speech that violates their conscience.  Based on what I heard yesterday outside the Court, there is little doubt that the ACLU and their allies want a government that has the power to crush any and all dissent to the sexual revolution, particularly when it comes to marriage.   

Inside the Court, the justices seemed to come down along predictable liberal vs. conservative lines, with the swing vote Anthony Kennedy sending mixed signals.  He clearly was concerned that the government of the state of Colorado, which attacked Jack Phillips, was acting out of anti-religious animus, but worried about the implications of accommodating religious belief.  Several justices were clearly uncomfortable with the obvious religious animus expressed by the ACLU’s attorney and the state of Colorado.  Whether that will be enough for the Justices to side with freedom and the constitution is anyone’s guess.

We likely won’t have a decision prior to the end of June, when the Court routinely releases its opinions in “controversial” cases.  In the meantime, continue to pray for the Court, for Jack Phillips, and all of those involved with this case. 

unnamed (4).jpg

Finally, I want to say thank you to all of you who joined us outside the Court yesterday!  Many of you met to get on buses in the dark, early morning hours and spent most of the morning standing in the chilly, Washington, DC December weather!  But the crowd was fantastic and sent a huge message to Jack Phillips and his family – We Got Your Back, Jack!